“Tens of hundreds of People have rejected the Trump administration’s callous effort to steal habitat away from our endangered species,” mentioned Earthjustice legal professional Kristen Boyles. “Trump’s proposed rule recklessly ignores frequent sense and customary science. We’ll do all that we will to make sure weak wildlife proceed to have a livable habitat and an opportunity at survival.”
“Wildlife can’t survive with out habitat — that’s not opinion, that’s biology,” mentioned Josh Osher, public coverage director for Western Watersheds Undertaking. “This proposed rule is an industry-crafted blueprint for extinction, designed to let companies destroy the very floor endangered species stand on, whereas pretending no hurt is being completed.”
“Loving wildlife is baked into our nationwide heritage. People are very proud that our nation has prioritized conserving birds, fish and different wildlife that make our nation so particular,” mentioned Ramona McGee, chief of the Southern Environmental Regulation Heart’s Wildlife Program. “Right here within the South, the stakes are a lot greater due to our world-renowned biodiversity, which is more and more in danger from human-made components like habitat destruction from unchecked, dangerous growth. It’s unconscionable that our leaders are unnecessarily trying to take away very important wildlife and habitat protections to placate extractive industries.”
“This nonstarter proposal ignores vital conservation provisions in a regulation that helps America’s most at-risk fish, wildlife, and plant populations, together with over 600 species with habitat in our nationwide parks,” mentioned Christina Hazard, legislative director for the Nationwide Parks Conservation Affiliation. “When meals sources, nesting grounds or mating grounds are misplaced outdoors of nationwide park boundaries, park wildlife will likely be misplaced as effectively.”
“Habitat integrity is among the many most vital determinants of species’ survival; this rule change would jeopardize imperiled animals and full ecosystems,” mentioned Danielle Kessler, US Nation Director on the Worldwide Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW). “Efficient, science-driven implementation of the Endangered Species Act–together with habitat safety–advantages animals and other people alike.”
“The Trump administration is trying to dismantle and discredit one among America’s hottest and profitable legal guidelines,” mentioned Sierra Weaver, senior legal professional at Defenders of Wildlife. “The present definition of ‘hurt’ is a big a part of what has made the ESA so efficient at conserving imperiled species. This isn’t simply redefining one phrase — it’s gutting the guts of the Act. It’ll have cataclysmic penalties to the habitats, lands and waters that America’s wildlife depends upon, and goes in opposition to Congress’ intent for the regulation.”
“Extinction is eternally,” says Katherine Miller, Nation Director for FOUR PAWS USA. “If we permit the ESA to be weakened and species’ habitats to be destroyed for revenue, the results of those selections will reverberate for generations. Science has proven that defending a listed species’ habitat is important to their survival and restoration. That is why we urge FWS and NMFS to withdraw their proposed rule and uphold America’s dedication to avoid wasting endangered species, guaranteeing a livable planet for all of us.”
“Lack of habitat is the primary purpose species turn into endangered,” mentioned Susan Holmes, Government Director of the Endangered Species Coalition. “Trump’s draconian proposal to finish habitat safety for our most weak wildlife rips out the guts of the Endangered Species Act and would put numerous species on the trail to extinction.”
“The Companies’ proposal reveals they aren’t critical about defending imperiled species,” mentioned Rebecca Riley, managing director for Meals & Agriculture at NRDC (Pure Assets Protection Council). “Habitat destruction is the primary menace to species’ survival, and but they’re arising with weak excuses to say Congress didn’t intend to deal with this existential menace.”
“Trump’s smash-and-grab habitat plan may welcome bulldozers and drilling rigs into the gorgeous wild locations that America’s most imperiled animals name dwelling,” mentioned Tara Zuardo, a senior campaigner on the Heart for Organic Range. “The administration’s proposal seeks to tear a bloody gap within the Endangered Species Act, prioritizing {industry} earnings over defending habitat that’s essential to stopping extinction. That is an unlawful try and nullify a landmark wildlife regulation that’s supported by practically each American who isn’t an oil govt, a timber baron or a Trump appointee.”
“Piping Plovers have been set on a path to extinction as a result of millinery and looking on the flip of the nineteenth century,” mentioned Chris Allieri, founder and govt director, NYC Plover Undertaking. “These will not be the challenges the species is at present going through. The primary menace in the present day is habitat loss, wherever they’re discovered, together with their wintering and breeding ranges. With out habitat safety, this species, and numerous extra, will go extinct.”
